I've noticed that Edge Router Lite gets DNS servers via DHCP from my ISP.
Is there a way to ignore these as I prefer to use Google's DNS.
yeri@sg:~$ show dns forwarding statistics ---------------- Cache statistics ---------------- Cache size: 10000 Queries forwarded: 61 Queries answered locally: 27 Total DNS entries inserted into cache: 230 DNS entries removed from cache before expiry: 0 --------------------- Nameserver statistics --------------------- Server: 172.17.5.68 Queries sent: 39 Queries retried or failed: 0 Server: 172.17.5.36 Queries sent: 33 Queries retried or failed: 0 Server: 2001:4860:4860::8888 Queries sent: 0 Queries retried or failed: 0 Server: 8.8.8.8 Queries sent: 11 Queries retried or failed: 0 Server: 2001:4860:4860::8844 Queries sent: 0 Queries retried or failed: 0 Server: 8.8.4.4 Queries sent: 11 Queries retried or failed: 0
yeri@sg:~$ show dhcp client leases interface : eth0 ip address : 182.55.213.251 [Active] subnet mask: 255.255.254.0 router : 182.55.212.1 name server: 172.17.5.68 172.17.5.36 dhcp server: 172.17.0.231 lease time : 14400 last update: Sat Nov 12 18:03:47 SGT 2016 expiry : Sat Nov 12 22:03:44 SGT 2016 reason : REBOOT
I also noticed that the DNS queries don't seem to get cached (+ there is a lot of timeout). Any idea why?
nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 405 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 447 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 351 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 4 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 356 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 2 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 344 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 388 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 315 msec nazgul /tmp $ dig yeri.be @10.60.111.1 | grep time ;; Query time: 434 msec
Those with 2-4 msec are timeouts. And 400+ msec for something that's supposed to be locally cached doesn't make sense.
Thanks