Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20028

Simple routing question: route between 2 subnets

Hi,

 

I own a ER PoE configured by the wizard with 1 port wan, 1 port on a subnet and and 3 ports grouped together in a virtual switch to another subnet. I remember reading that grouping the 4 ports together would have an impact on performance (although it is probably theoritical in my case, this is a home installation...) so I decided to leave it as such. 

 

However, I need a device on port 3 (192.168.9.15) to access a device on the lonely port . To be more specific, that device is an IP Camera configured with a static IP (192.168.0.250), and I can't just connect directly my computer (with a fixed ip on the 192.168.0.xx subdomain) to it and change the network settings (to DHCP) because the camera needs PoE for power (which obviously my computer doesn't have). So I connected the camera ro eth1.. but somehow I need to change the subnet mask (?) or add a route so that from my browser in subnet 192.168.9.xx i can access the camera and change the network settings. 

 

However, even changing to DHCP, the way my router is currently configured, the camera will receive an IP in the 192.168.0.xx subnet, and I still want to be able to access it.

 

Can I do so without the performance hit that was discussed before by simply adding a route or modifiying the subnet mask..?

 

Thanks


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20028

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>